http://snuproject.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/
Quote from above – ‘The key is that generalized non-reciprocity
cannot be imposed by any top-down force, however benign, but must by
necessity mature in the real society as people can gradually move
towards it as sufficiency and abundance replace scarcity dynamics.’
One large factor being ignored here is the role of childcare usually
provided by the mother, the basis of all non-reciprocal relationships,
producing value which is nowhere acknowledged as an economic asset, but
without which no society could exist. or regenerate itself. I hesitate
to mention the word ‘love’ in this context but without it why would
people move towards more generalised reciprocity? It is that primary
relationship with a carer – not to exclude fathers or others – which is
the first experience of sufficiency and abundance, which will set the
pattern of receiving and giving, and will enable a deeper connection
with and solidarity with humanity as a whole. In that ability to care,
engendered by that first primary relationship, care for ourselves and
the other, we can discover our deep need to give, to contribute to
another’s well-being, which can nourish our own dignity and empowerment.
Through that experience we can envisage the maturity described above
moving towards the ‘social individualism’ described by Marx and further
towards the ‘Communism [that] is the voluntary cooperation among
individuals for both social good and for their own pleasure and
development.’
This is not a relationship that has to be created. It is our natural
relationship to each other and to the world which is distorted by the
economic system of markets and money mechanisms, which alienates us from
our true selves. It remains to be discovered when that conditioning and
those conditions are thrown off. Whether we have to go through a
transition period will depend more, in my opinion, on how quickly we
recognise the motivating role of Love and the priority of the
mother/carer/child relationship.
Anna
Q
Quote from above – ‘The key is that generalized non-reciprocity cannot be imposed by any top-down force, however benign, but must by necessity mature in the real society as people can gradually move towards it as sufficiency and abundance replace scarcity dynamics.’
One large factor being ignored here is the role of childcare usually provided by the mother, the basis of all non-reciprocal relationships, producing value which is nowhere acknowledged as an economic asset, but without which no society could exist. or regenerate itself. I hesitate to mention the word ‘love’ in this context but without it why would people move towards more generalised reciprocity? It is that primary relationship with a carer – not to exclude fathers or others – which is the first experience of sufficiency and abundance, which will set the pattern of receiving and giving, and will enable a deeper connection with and solidarity with humanity as a whole. In that ability to care, engendered by that first primary relationship, care for ourselves and the other, we can discover our deep need to give, to contribute to another’s well-being, which can nourish our own dignity and empowerment. Through that experience we can envisage the maturity described above moving towards the ‘social individualism’ described by Marx and further towards the ‘Communism [that] is the voluntary cooperation among individuals for both social good and for their own pleasure and development.’
This is not a relationship that has to be created. It is our natural relationship to each other and to the world which is distorted by the economic system of markets and money mechanisms, which alienates us from our true selves. It remains to be discovered when that conditioning and those conditions are thrown off. Whether we have to go through a transition period will depend more, in my opinion, on how quickly we recognise the motivating role of Love and the priority of the mother/carer/child relationship.
Anna
Q